IP & Technology Attorney
in Los Angeles

Yes. Aghil Ebrahimi, Esq. is admitted to the State Bar of California (Bar No. 337953) and is in active good standing. He is authorized to advise and represent clients on California law matters, including IP, technology, AI compliance, and entertainment contracts.

Yes. Creators are a core part of the practice. We help Los Angeles-based influencers, musicians, visual artists, and digital content creators with brand protection, content licensing, collaboration agreements, and IP ownership disputes. We understand the creator economy because we have lived it.

Yes. We advise LA-based tech companies and AI startups on California-specific issues including AB 2013 (AI training data transparency), CCPA/CPRA data privacy obligations, and emerging federal AI policy. We help you build compliant AI products from the ground up.

Our Los Angeles clients include independent creators and influencers, music and entertainment companies, AI and SaaS startups, digital agencies, and growth-stage tech companies in the Silicon Beach ecosystem. If your business lives at the intersection of technology, content, or creative IP, we can help.

Book a strategy call directly through our scheduling link. No intake forms, no gatekeepers. You will speak with Aghil Ebrahimi, Esq. directly. Come ready to describe your business and the legal issue you are facing, and we will map out next steps together.

Trademarks are federal. Any USPTO-registered attorney can file regardless of state bar. But the surrounding work (business entity setup, contract enforcement, employment law, right of publicity) is California-specific and requires California licensure. As an attorney admitted to the State Bar of California, I cover both sides under one engagement.

AB 2013 requires developers of generative AI systems used in California to publish documentation about their training datasets: sources, modifications, copyrighted material, personal information, and aggregate data flagged for confidentiality. Compliance disclosures must be posted before the system is offered. Building documentation discipline into the development process from the start is cheaper than reconstructing it under a regulator request.

Yes. Platform disputes follow predictable procedures: DMCA counter-notices, IP reporting appeals, and terms-of-service escalation paths. I assess whether the strike has legal merit, draft the response, and handle the platform escalation. The first move matters because most platforms only allow one well-formed appeal per dispute.

California's right of publicity statute, Civil Code §3344, and common law protect your name, voice, image, and likeness from unauthorized commercial use. AI-generated deepfakes that use your identifiable voice or likeness for commercial purposes can violate these rights. Remedies include injunctive relief, actual damages, and in some cases statutory damages.

When LA businesses sell into Canada, stream music to Canadian audiences, or expand SaaS products north of the border, IP protection has to follow. I hold bar admissions in California, Ontario, and Quebec, which means USPTO and CIPO filings, US and Canadian privacy compliance, and cross-border contract work all stay under one engagement. Domestic California work is the core. Cross-border coverage is available when you need it.